Validation of a constraint questionnaire against work incident by biological fluid among the nursing staff of a public hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
METHODS: From February to September 2013, a nursing staff census was carried out in a public hospital in São Paulo, Brazil. Four items composed the constraint questionnaire: if the nurse in emergency situation can carry out his/hers tasks according to technical guidelines; if the nurse's production is delayed by his/hers execution of the assigned tasks with the necessary care according to technical guidelines; if personal protection equipment (PPE) hampers the execution of a good job; and how often the nurse stopped using PPE. The first question was dichotomous and the others included a likert scale, never (zero score) up to always (four scores). Work incident by biological fluid was the gold standard, and its frequency was categorized as: always, frequently, sometimes, seldom, never. Zero value was assigned to the seldom and never categories, and one to the others. R software was used to analyze the validity, using logistic regression, gold standard versus the total sum of the four questions. Cutoff, sensitivity and specificity were also analyzed.
RESULTS: Approximately 92%(N=1648) of nurses were interviewed. Incident’s prevalence was 35%(CI95%:33%-37%). The mean for the constraint questionnaire was 3,25(CI95%:3,14-3,36). OR was 1,20(CI95%:1,15-1,26), a one increase in the score of feeling constraint was associated with an increase of 20% in the chance of the nurse suffering an incident. Cutoff was seven scores, sensibility 14% and specificity 93%.
CONCLUSIONS: Constraint questionnaire for nursing staff was valid, but its sharpness was better to identify nurses with low constraint that the inverse.